Day: June 17, 2026

A year ago, Ukraine made about 70% of the new weapons it cleared for its army. This year, it makes nearly 90%

Ukraine’s Defense Ministry has authorized 1,000 new weapons and equipment samples since January 2026, of which 892 are built in Ukraine  https://t.co/D4V57nxeOb

— @EuromaidanPress Jun 17, 2026

Hezbollah: The Iranian regime is interpreting the clause in the agreement about a ceasefire “on all fronts” as a requirement for Israel to cease operations against Hezbollah and withdraw from Lebanon. This interpretation is part of a broader Iranian effort to preserve Hezbollah by trying to secure Israel’s capitulation in Lebanon. The MoU reportedly states that Iran and the United States, along with their allies, agree to “an immediate and permanent end to the war on all fronts, including Lebanon” and commit to “not launch any hostile action against each other.” Iranian officials and media have argued that any Israeli attack against Hezbollah or Israeli military presence in Lebanon constitutes a violation of the MoU. Israel does not appear to be a signatory to the MoU and continues to operate against Hezbollah in southern Lebanon, however. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) continued to launch airstrikes against Hezbollah targets in response to Hezbollah attacks on Israeli forces in southern Israel.Institute for the Study of War (@TheStudyofWar)NEW: Multiple sources published what appears to be the text of the US-Iran agreement. Neither the United States nor Iran has officially published the text of the agreement at this time. The leaked text of the agreement, if accurate, indicates that Iran has emerged from the conflict in a stronger strategic position, however. ⬇️

The MoU reportedly grants Iran significant economic relief, which Iran would likely use to try to reconstitute its missile, drone, and nuclear programs, as well as the Axis of Resistance. The MoU states that Iran could receive further economic relief by fulfilling its commitments in the MoU and reaching a final agreement that addresses key nuclear issues. ISW-CTP has not observed any indications that Iranian decision-makers are willing to make concessions on the nuclear issues that would be included in a final agreement, however.

Iran will likely try to exploit the agreement’s seemingly ambiguous language about the Strait of Hormuz to try to enforce its control over shipping through the strait. The reported text of the agreement does not explicitly bar Iran from “managing” the strait, and Iran could therefore continue to insist on vessels using its illegal traffic separation scheme in Iranian territorial waters and paying “fees” to the IRGC Navy.

The Iranian regime is interpreting the clause in the agreement about a ceasefire “on all fronts” as a requirement for Israel to cease operations against Hezbollah and withdraw from Lebanon. This interpretation is part of a broader Iranian effort to preserve Hezbollah by trying to secure Israel’s capitulation in Lebanon.

The reported MoU terms indicate that Iran structured the agreement in a way to try to limit the United States’ ability to impose renewed pressure on Iran during the 60-day negotiations period and thereby make it more challenging for the United States to extract concessions from Iran during the negotiations.

Iranian officials and media are largely framing the US-Iran MoU as an Iranian victory that codifies Iran’s military achievements. The Iranian regime’s English-language media outlet, Press TV, argued on June 16 that the MoU is not simply a ceasefire, but rather represents the “political codification of a battlefield reality.”—  https://x.com/TheStudyofWar/status/2067068251377381685

— Institute for the Study of War (@TheStudyofWar) Jun 17, 2026