Categories
Blog and Tweets Featured Posts

The Gusinsky’s Revenge, Part 2


The Gusinsky’s Revenge

Part 2   |   Part 1

The Investigation in tweets

The Deus ex machina

Gusinsky and Lesin – GS

Vladimir Gusinsky and Mikhail Lesin were two influential Russian media figures involved in the post-Soviet media landscape. Gusinsky, a prominent media mogul and founder of the NTV television network, had a contentious relationship with the Kremlin and ultimately fled Russia. Lesin, a former press minister and media advisor to the Kremlin, was instrumental in shaping the state-controlled media and played a key role in developing the industry. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

 

Here’s a breakdown of their roles and interactions:

 

Vladimir Gusinsky: [1, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]
  • Media Mogul: Gusinsky was a highly successful businessman who founded NTV, the first major independent television network in Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
  • Controversial Figure:His media outlets were critical of the government, leading to ongoing conflict with the Kremlin and President Vladimir Putin.
  • Fled Russia: After facing criminal charges and pressure from the government, Gusinsky was forced to flee Russia in 2000.
  • Later Life: He continued to be involved in media, though his influence in Russia diminished.
Mikhail Lesin: [1, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24]
  • Government Official and Advisor:Lesin served as Russia’s Minister of Press, Television, and Radio, and later as an advisor to President Putin.
  • Shaped State Media: He played a significant role in establishing and controlling state-aligned media, often working to consolidate power and promote the Kremlin’s agenda.
  • Controversial Figure: Like Gusinsky, Lesin was a complex and controversial figure, with critics accusing him of suppressing media freedom.
  • Mysterious Death: Lesin died in 2015 under circumstances that remain debated, with some sources attributing his death to natural causes and others suggesting foul play.
Key Interaction: [1, 25]
  • Gusinsky and Lesin’s paths crossed when Lesin was in a position of power within the government and Gusinsky was a target. Lesin was instrumental in the crackdown on independent media, including NTV, and ultimately contributed to the decline of Gusinsky’s media empire.
In essence, Gusinsky represented the struggle for independent media in Russia, while Lesin represented the state’s efforts to control the narrative. [1, 26, 27, 28]



AI responses may include mistakes.


Categories
Sites

OSCE PA Delegation Concludes Visit to Georgia, Notes Absence of ‘Political Dialogue’


OSCE Parliamentary Assembly President Pere Joan Pons and a high-level delegation concluded a three-day visit to Georgia on March 10 aimed at “encouraging dialogue, strengthening democratic institutions, and promoting engagement across the political spectrum,” the organization said in a press release.

During the March 8-10 visit, the delegation met with key Georgian Dream officials, including Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze, Foreign Minister Maka Botchorishvili, Interior Minister Geka Geladze, Speaker of the disputed parliament Shalva Papuashvili, and GD-elected President Mikheil Kavelashvili, as well as Public Defender Levan Ioseliani. The delegation also met with opposition parties both inside and outside parliament, civil society members, and representatives of the diplomatic community. On the first day of the visit, they also visited the occupation line and met with internally displaced persons.

The visit came amid Georgia’s protracted political crisis, marked by government crackdowns, ongoing anti-government protests, and opposition efforts to stand united against the ruling party. The OSCE press release particularly emphasized the “absence of political dialogue” as a “serious obstacle” for Georgia.

In the press release, OSCE PA President Pons is quoted as saying he was “shocked” to discover that politicians in Georgia “are not communicating with each other” and called on “all sides” to “engage constructively” and “begin direct communication aimed at restoring dialogue,” noting that “the government has a special responsibility in this.”

The press release added that the delegation “welcomed” the “broad consensus” regarding Georgia’s European integration aspirations and said the next elections, “when held,” must be in line with OSCE commitments. “However, they noted that the severe polarization in the political scene will continue to serve as an obstacle to achieving these aims, and reflected that in the future voters will reward those seen as pursuing them in a constructive manner,” the release said.

Luis Graca, Special Representative on the South Caucasus, is quoted as saying, “It is clear that the polarization within politics and society in Georgia is blocking the country from reaching its potential,” noting that they expect political leaders in Georgia, despite their disagreements, to work together.

He continued, “Let us be clear again, as I was in October: the use of violence against state institutions is not acceptable. Change must be made through the ballot box and through policy-making bodies, not through violence aimed at overthrowing them,” in what appeared to be a reference to the October 4, 2025, election-day unrest in Tbilisi, when a group of protesters, at the organizations’ call, attempted to occupy the presidential palace.

Baroness Christine Blower is quoted as saying, “It is not up to us in the OSCE or any other international body to fix the problems here. This is up to the people and leaders of Georgia, and I hope to see responsible steps to de-escalate the political scene and get back to actual political dialogue.”

The press release further said that the delegation “noted with regret” efforts by the ruling party to ban “certain opposition parties,” saying it would “likely exacerbate divisions and result in further isolation.” On March 9, during the delegation’s visit, PM Irakli Kobakhidze said Georgian Dream may amend its appeal to the Constitutional Court, which seeks to ban major opposition forces, to cover even more parties in response to the opposition parties’ announced alliance.

Another member of the OSCE PA delegation, Jevrosima Pejovic, is quoted as saying, “Banning parties or regular political or civil activity is not the way forward.” She noted the concerns raised by OSCE/ODIHR related to “recently adopted legislation” and called on authorities to “address the shortcomings.” She added, however, that politics likewise “should take place within the relevant institutions, and boycotts cannot serve as an alternative to dialogue and political activism.”

The press release added that the delegation requested authorities to meet with individuals “described by opposition forces as political prisoners” and “regretted that this was not possible on this occasion.” Among those the delegation wanted to see was jailed journalist Mzia Amaghlobeli.

The press release additionally said that during their visit to the “Administrative Boundary Line,” the delegation “reaffirmed the OSCE PA’s strong and consistent support for Georgia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders,” adding that the “humanitarian consequences of the continued occupation remain a matter of international concern.”

“The visit forms part of the Assembly’s continued engagement with Georgia,” the press release said, “including election observation and parliamentary co-operation, and its findings are expected to be discussed at the OSCE PA’s upcoming Bureau Meeting and Annual Session in The Hague.”

Also Read:

The post OSCE PA Delegation Concludes Visit to Georgia, Notes Absence of ‘Political Dialogue’ first appeared on The South Caucasus News – SouthCaucasusNews.com.