Categories
Blog and Tweets Featured Posts

The Gusinsky’s Revenge, Part 2


The Gusinsky’s Revenge

Part 2   |   Part 1

The Investigation in tweets

The Deus ex machina

Gusinsky and Lesin – GS

Vladimir Gusinsky and Mikhail Lesin were two influential Russian media figures involved in the post-Soviet media landscape. Gusinsky, a prominent media mogul and founder of the NTV television network, had a contentious relationship with the Kremlin and ultimately fled Russia. Lesin, a former press minister and media advisor to the Kremlin, was instrumental in shaping the state-controlled media and played a key role in developing the industry. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]

 

Here’s a breakdown of their roles and interactions:

 

Vladimir Gusinsky: [1, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]
  • Media Mogul: Gusinsky was a highly successful businessman who founded NTV, the first major independent television network in Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
  • Controversial Figure:His media outlets were critical of the government, leading to ongoing conflict with the Kremlin and President Vladimir Putin.
  • Fled Russia: After facing criminal charges and pressure from the government, Gusinsky was forced to flee Russia in 2000.
  • Later Life: He continued to be involved in media, though his influence in Russia diminished.
Mikhail Lesin: [1, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24]
  • Government Official and Advisor:Lesin served as Russia’s Minister of Press, Television, and Radio, and later as an advisor to President Putin.
  • Shaped State Media: He played a significant role in establishing and controlling state-aligned media, often working to consolidate power and promote the Kremlin’s agenda.
  • Controversial Figure: Like Gusinsky, Lesin was a complex and controversial figure, with critics accusing him of suppressing media freedom.
  • Mysterious Death: Lesin died in 2015 under circumstances that remain debated, with some sources attributing his death to natural causes and others suggesting foul play.
Key Interaction: [1, 25]
  • Gusinsky and Lesin’s paths crossed when Lesin was in a position of power within the government and Gusinsky was a target. Lesin was instrumental in the crackdown on independent media, including NTV, and ultimately contributed to the decline of Gusinsky’s media empire.
In essence, Gusinsky represented the struggle for independent media in Russia, while Lesin represented the state’s efforts to control the narrative. [1, 26, 27, 28]



AI responses may include mistakes.


Categories
Sites

Rubio Hopes to Change ‘Trajectory’ of U.S. Relationship with Georgia, Tbilisi’s ‘Behavior’


United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio expressed hope to “perhaps change the trajectory not just of [U.S.] relationship with Georgia, but of their behavior” as he responded to the question of Rep. Joe Wilson during a hearing at the House Foreign Affairs Committee on June 3.

Rep. Wilson, a fierce critic of Georgian Dream rule, asked Rubio what “should be done to address the rapidly expanding radicalization promoted by the Georgian Dream government in the Republic of Georgia.” Apparently referring to the GD government, Wilson said: “The pro-Iranian regime — and the Chinese Communist Party supported Georgian Dream government, which is illegitimate — threatened American access. There was a rigged election in Georgia. With that in mind, they’re facilitating the Islamic Revolutionary Guard in evading sanctions to Tehran.”

Responding to Rep. Wilson, Secretary Rubio said: “You’re right. Everything you just outlined is our preexisting concerns, since that time they’ve made some steps indicating to us they want to improve relations with the United States, we’ve outlined to them what that would take, what that would require, we have seen some positive responses, and so our hope is that we can see a change in trajectory in the case of Georgia from where it is today.”

Rubio called Rep. Wilson’s points “preexisting problems for us,” noting that “they [Tbilisi] have asked us what will it take to have a better relationship with the United States, we’ve responded, and hopefully we can build on that basis and perhaps change the trajectory not just of our relationship with Georgia, but of their behavior.”

The remarks come amid continued uncertainty, but also intensifying contacts, in Tbilisi–Washington relations. After a prolonged period of strain in bilateral ties, recent months have seen increased engagement between officials from the two countries, including a phone call between Secretary Rubio and Georgian Dream Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze, as well as repeated visits to Tbilisi by U.S. State Department representatives.

In a statement that followed the latest such visit late in May, the U.S. delegation said that during the meeting with GD officials, the sides discussed “a path forward for improving bilateral relations,” stressing the need for “a stable domestic political climate that facilitates opposition engagement,” among others, for a sustainable strategic partnership between the two countries.

The United States, under the Joe Biden administration, suspended its strategic partnership with Georgia, a traditional ally, in November 2024 during the Tbilisi protests and later in the same year imposed sanctions on the ruling party’s billionaire founder, Bidzina Ivanishvili. The Donald Trump administration has yet to reverse those decisions.

Also Read:

The post Rubio Hopes to Change ‘Trajectory’ of U.S. Relationship with Georgia, Tbilisi’s ‘Behavior’ first appeared on The South Caucasus News – SouthCaucasusNews.com.

The post Rubio Hopes to Change ‘Trajectory’ of U.S. Relationship with Georgia, Tbilisi’s ‘Behavior’ first appeared on The World Web Times – worldwebtimes.com.