She then goes to explain that Intersectionality is about minority groups standing up for each other.
Intersectionality originates in critical theory and Black feminist scholarship.
Kimberlé Crenshaw coined the term in 1989 to describe her claim that overlapping social categories (race, sex, class) can produce distinct forms of disadvantage that single-axis analyses miss.
She argued that Black women can face discrimination that neither purely racial nor purely gendered frameworks can fully captured.
It has since expanded in academia, activism and institutions into a broader lens emphasizing interlocking systems of power, privilege, and oppression.
Intersectionality treats social outcomes primarily through hierarchies of systemic oppression rather than individual agency, culture, behavior, cognitive distributions or market processes.
This aligns with radical egalitarian traditions that prioritize equality of outcome across identity groups and view liberal institutions, markets and merit as mechanisms that reproduce hierarchy.
In practice, intersectional analysis often underpins demands for race and sex-conscious policies, equity (as distinct from equality of opportunity), speech codes, DEI mandates and critiques of “Whiteness,” “patriarchy,” or “heteronormativity” as structural rather than individual.
It has been deeply adopted in humanities and social-science faculties, NGOs, and progressive political coalitions over the past decades.
From Crenshaw’s legal scholarship it migrated into critical race theory, queer theory and fourth-wave feminism, then into campus activism, corporate HR and electoral left platforms.
Video
