|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Categories
Day: December 11, 2025
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was due to hold urgent talks Thursday with leaders and officials from about 30 countries that are supporting Kyiv’s effort to obtain fair terms for an end to the war with Russia.
The post Zelenskyy will hold urgent talks with 30 countries as Trump pushes for swift peace deal with Russia first appeared on October Surprise 2016 – octobersurprise2016.org.
Brooklyn @KKElectronicseu Dec 11, 2025 RT by @Xudozhnikipoeti: «Ark of the Covenant (A gift for King Selassie)» by Jacques Joseph Tissot (Oil on canvas, National Gallery of Jamaica, 1868)… «Ark of the Covenant (A gift for King Selassie)» by Jacques Joseph Tissot (Oil on canvas, National Gallery of Jamaica, 1868)— K.K. Electronics (@KKElectronicseu) Dec […]
The post Brooklyn first appeared on The News And Times Review – NewsAndTimes.org.
Many Americans underestimate how much sleep influences long-term health, but new research suggests the consequences may be far more serious than previously understood. A sweeping analysis of sleep habits and longevity across the country links insufficient rest to shorter life expectancy regard…
The post Researchers identify sleep trend that may affect how long people live first appeared on Trump News – trump-news.org.
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled on December 11 that Georgia violated three rights during the violent dispersal of the June 20-21, 2019, protests in Tbilisi, known as “Gavrilov’s Night.”
In a unanimous judgement, the Court found Georgia in violation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which prohibits inhuman and degrading treatment, for 24 of the 26 applicants. It also found breaches of Article 10, protecting freedom of expression, for 14 applicants, and Article 11, on freedom of assembly, for 11 applicants. The Court found no violation of Article 38, which concerns a state’s obligation to cooperate with the Court
Five applications – Berikashvili v. Georgia, Kurdovanidze and others v. Georgia, Baghashvili and others v. Georgia, Svanadze v. Georgia, and Tsaava and Kmuzov v. Georgia – were filed with the ECtHR by 26 activists and journalists.
The cases stemmed from protests that erupted after Russian MP Sergei Gavrilov addressed an Inter-parliamentary Assembly from the Georgian Parliament Speaker’s chair, triggering outrage and a night of brutal dispersal on Rustaveli Avenue.
The Court criticized both the operation and the subsequent investigation, saying, “Although the ensuing investigation had already lasted for more than five and a half years, it had not yet resulted in a comprehensive assessment of all the relevant circumstances, nor led to findings or charges in relation to the applicants’ ill-treatment or the identities of the State agents who had used – or ordered the use of – allegedly excessive force agains them,” the court said. “It could not, therefore, be regarded as effective.”
It also said there was “simply no evidence” that the injuries sustained by any of the applicants had been “inevitable consequence of their own conduct,” as the Court noted significant shortcomings in Georgia’s legal framework regulating rubber bullet use and in the manner the demonstration was dispersed.
Journalists, the Court said, were also prevented from covering the events safely, and protesters faced “an unjustified degree of force.”
The Court ordered Georgia to pay two applicants EUR 75,000 each and two others EUR 85,000 in pecuniary damages, awarded all applicants various amounts for non-pecuniary damage, and ordered EUR 38,414 jointly to 22 applicants for costs and expenses.
The ruling follows a May 7 judgment, in which the Court found Georgia failed to conduct an effective investigation into the crackdown. Authorities later in July revived investigative actions, and on November 12, charged former Interior Minister Giorgi Gakharia with abuse of power connected to the events. The Tbilisi City Court ordered his detention in absentia the next day.
Responding to the Grand Chamber ruling, the Justice Ministry said it had reviewed the Interior Ministry’s planning and execution of the 2019 operation and that the renewed inquiry had led to criminal proceedings against Gakharia. The investigation, it added, remains ongoing.
Gakharia, now an opposition For Georgia party leader, is in exile after prosecutors opened the investigations. He denied any wrongdoing and previously defended his actions before a temporary parliamentary investigative commission chaired by Tea Tsulukiani.
Also Read:
- 14/11/2025 – Gakharia, in Exile, Joins Berlin’s Hertie School as Fellow
- 28/12/2023 – Interior Ministry Ordered to Pay Damages and Monthly Allowance to June 20 Protesters
- 12/11/2019 – Prosecutor’s Office Grants Victim Status to Three Persons Injured in June 20-21 Dispersal
- 28/10/2019 – Court Refuses to Grant Victim Status to People Injured in June 20-21 Dispersal
The post ECtHR Grand Chamber Rules Georgia Violated Three Rights in 2019 ‘Gavrilov’s Night’ Crackdown first appeared on The South Caucasus News – SouthCaucasusNews.com.
Audio News Review RFE/RL Dec 11, 2025 Новости Новости Радио Свобода: точность, оперативность, беспристрастность… RFE/RL Dec 11, 2025 Новости Новости Радио Свобода: точность, оперативность, беспристрастность… FOX News Podcasts Dec 11, 2025 ‘Math Problem’ Is Fueling An Education Emergency Studies show more students are arriving at college unable to do basic math, forcing even top
@kiraincongress Ukraine should be grateful that still exists we won’t send the weapons that we pay from our taxis for the protection of our nation’s to you you stealing our money thru the EU we won’t fund you losers for ever you are a lost cause anyways.
— the nationalist (@nationalist2345) Dec 11, 2025
The post @kiraincongress Ukraine should be grateful that still exists we won’t send the weapons that we pay from our taxis for the protection of our nation’s to you you stealing our money thru the EU we won’t fund you losers for ever you are a lost cause anyways. first appeared on The Russian World – russianworld.net.
@kiraincongress Ukraine should be grateful that still exists we won’t send the weapons that we pay from our taxis for the protection of our nation’s to you you stealing our money thru the EU we won’t fund you losers for ever you are a lost cause anyways.
— the nationalist (@nationalist2345) Dec 11, 2025
The post @kiraincongress Ukraine should be grateful that still exists we won’t send the weapons that we pay from our taxis for the protection of our nation’s to you you stealing our money thru the EU we won’t fund you losers for ever you are a lost cause anyways. first appeared on The Russian World – russianworld.net.
Categories
Clever
Why some perceive Trump as pro-Russian and anti-Ukraine: 15 documented patterns
This is no longer an issue for debate! But if some still want to, here is your list of rebuttals.
1) Calls Zelensky a “dictator” but never applies the term to Putin, despite Putin’s 25-year rule, rigged elections, political assassinations, and total media control, while Zelensky was democratically elected in 2019.
2) Publicly blamed Ukraine, not Russia, for 2016 election interference, directly repeating a Kremlin disinformation line rejected by the entire U.S. intelligence community.
3) Unilaterally froze $391 million in congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine in 2019 to extract political favors (investigations into Biden), a hold the GAO ruled illegal. Never froze or conditioned aid to Russia or its allies.
4) Repeatedly threatened to abandon NATO allies in NATO, telling Russia to “do whatever the hell they want” to members who don’t meet spending targets, Russia’s #1 strategic goal for decades.
5) Has called Putin “smart,” “savvy,” and “a genius” multiple times, even after the full-scale invasion. Has never once praised Zelensky’s wartime leadership in comparable terms.
6) Opposed new Russia sanctions and complained existing ones were “too tough,” while never expressing concern that sanctions hurt Ukraine.
7) Regularly questions why the U.S. should help Ukraine at all and claims he could end the war “in 24 hours”, widely understood as code for forcing Kyiv to cede territory and accept Russian terms.
8) Consistently downplays Russia’s invasion, atrocities, and casualties; frames Ukraine as an “ungrateful client state” (a recurring Russian propaganda theme).
9) Has never once condemned Putin’s political assassinations (Navalny, Nemtsov, etc.) or war crimes in Bucha, Mariupol, etc., yet routinely attacks Zelensky, NATO allies, and U.S. leaders.
10) Pushed a leaked 2025 “peace plan” that would recognize Russian annexation of Crimea and parts of Donbas, cap Ukraine’s army size, block NATO membership, lift U.S. sanctions on Russia, and reinvite Moscow to the G7—without requiring Russian troop withdrawal.
11) Delayed or undermined U.S. military aid packages in 2023–2024 (with allies like Mike Johnson and JD Vance), leaving Ukraine ammunition-starved during critical months of fighting.
12) Continues to praise Putin’s strength in 2025 while attacking Zelensky as a “dictator without elections” who is prolonging the war—ignoring wartime constitutional rules and Putin’s quarter-century grip on power.
13) Appointed and elevated voices (Tulsi Gabbard, JD Vance, etc.) who blame NATO expansion for the war and openly say they “don’t care” what happens to Ukraine.
14) In multiple 2024–2025 statements floated reopening Nord Stream 2 and normalizing economic ties with Russia without linking it to war crimes accountability or reconstruction aid for Ukraine.
15) Publicly humiliated Zelensky in the February 28, 2025 Oval Office meeting (with Vance tag-teaming) over his wartime attire and supposed lack of gratitude, demanding he dress formally and show more deference, while never making similar demands of Putin or Russian officials.
These 15 items aren’t cherry-picked quotes or fringe interpretations. They’re public statements, documented policy actions, and leaked proposals spanning 2016 to late 2025. Taken together, they form a clear, consistent pattern that aligns with Russian strategic interests and undermines Ukraine’s ability to defend itself.
#OSINT #Russia #Trump #Zelensky #Ukraine
— OSINT Intuit
(@UKikaski) Dec 11, 2025
The post Why some perceive Trump as pro-Russian and anti-Ukraine: 15 documented patterns This is no longer an issue for debate! But if some still want to, here is your list of rebuttals. 1) Calls Zelensky a “dictator” but never applies the term to Putin, despite Putin’s 25-year rule, rigged elections, political assassinations, and total media control, while Zelensky was democratically elected in 2019. 2) Publicly blamed Ukraine, not Russia, for 2016 election interference, directly repeating a Kremlin disinformation line rejected by the entire U.S. intelligence community. 3) Unilaterally froze $391 million in congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine in 2019 to extract political favors (investi first appeared on JOSSICA – jossica.com.
