Categories
Sites

Covid immune response study could explain why some escape infection – The Guardian


The post Covid immune response study could explain why some escape infection – The Guardian first appeared on The CoronaVirus Alerts – The News And Times.


Categories
Sites

Floodwaters and bird flu continue to rise in Minnesota, COVID remains low – MPR News


The post Floodwaters and bird flu continue to rise in Minnesota, COVID remains low – MPR News first appeared on The CoronaVirus Alerts – The News And Times.


Categories
Sites

CDC recommends Americans 6 months and older get COVID vaccine – WRAL News


The post CDC recommends Americans 6 months and older get COVID vaccine – WRAL News first appeared on The CoronaVirus Alerts – The News And Times.


Categories
Sites

Outer-borough businesses surged past Manhattan during Covid – Crain’s New York Business


The post Outer-borough businesses surged past Manhattan during Covid – Crain’s New York Business first appeared on The CoronaVirus Alerts – The News And Times.


Categories
Sites

CDC recommends updated COVID-19 vaccination for this fall – KOLO


The post CDC recommends updated COVID-19 vaccination for this fall – KOLO first appeared on The CoronaVirus Alerts – The News And Times.


Categories
Sites

FBI Witness Adds Up the Cash, Gold Bars at Bob Menendez’s House – Yahoo! Voices


The post FBI Witness Adds Up the Cash, Gold Bars at Bob Menendez’s House – Yahoo! Voices first appeared on The South Caucasus News.


Categories
Sites

Credibility of prosecutors’ star witness comes under fire in Sen. Bob Menendez bribery trial – CBS News


The post Credibility of prosecutors’ star witness comes under fire in Sen. Bob Menendez bribery trial – CBS News first appeared on The South Caucasus News.


Categories
Sites

Kazakhstan: Mme Balayeva’s Information Ministry For Years Ignores Anti-Kazakh Hate Comments In Kazakhstani E-Media – OpEd


Kazakhstan: Mme Balayeva’s Information Ministry For Years Ignores Anti-Kazakh Hate Comments In Kazakhstani E-Media – OpEd

Here is an ordinary reportage article entitled “[Minister of Culture and Information] Balayeva explained why there are no foreign films in the Kazakh language in cinemas”, published in Nur.kz, one of the country’s most popular online media outlets, on October 6, 2023. Below are reactions from 2 readers. The second one of those two under the nickname ZapadNamNePomozhet [‘The West Won’t help us’], commenting apparently on the announcement by Minister Aida Balayeva that “there are five companies preparing translations of foreign animated kids’ films into Kazakh”, wrote the following: “There are not enough words in the Kazakh language to translate human languages [into it]?”. If that’s not a hate comment against the Kazakhs and their native language expressed publicly, what is it?!;

That comment came at 10:53 pm on October 6, 2023, and is still available to read. It seems that none of those to whom it may concern suspect that like any other country, Kazakhstan has laws forbidding public humiliation on a racial, national, or religious basis. Take, for example, Article 174 of the Criminal Code. Paragraph 1 of this article states that if such “acts are committed in public or through the use of mass media, telecommunications networks, and online platforms… [they] are punishable by a fine in the amount of two thousand to seven thousand monthly calculation indices or by restriction of liberty for a period of two to seven years, or imprisonment for the same period”.

As for the Ministry of Culture and Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan, it should have already paid attention to this case, and taken appropriate measures regarding it a long time ago. But so far, that remains merely a good wish. 

What’s especially sad is that this was not the first such incident over the years.

And here is an analytical piece titled “The Korean-Kazakh mixed marriages have been and still are a quite widespread phenomenon”, published in Zonakz.net, another one of the country’s most popular online media outlets, on July 12, 2018. Below are reactions from 2 readers, as well. According to the first one of those two, under the name, or nickname Kirill Kartashov, “there is nothing wrong with interethnic marriages, and it’s time to get used to them”. The second one, under the name, or nickname Slava Voznyak, claims that the Kazakhs want to gain a European appearance, and they are not at all against interracial marriages. He further says: “Asians [Kazakhs], please don’t disfigure European appearance with your Asian genes. And you, judging by your appearance, were born of such a marriage union [to parents with one of them belonging to the European race], but you externally still look horrible”.

That comment came three years ago and is still available to read. It is not entirely clear how it must be qualified from the Criminal Code perspective. But one thing is clear – there was an action aimed at promoting racial superiority and humiliating national dignity. In this regard, the norms on the interdiction of discrimination and stimulation of humiliation of national dignity, provided for by the media outlet’s operating license, seem to be quite applicable.

The responsibility for monitoring compliance with such norms and for taking appropriate measures in case of non-compliance with them rests with the Ministry of Culture and Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan headed for the time being by Mme Aida Balayeva. But that Ministry for years ignores the above comments and others like them.

Mme Aida Balayeva is the third Information Minister of Kazakhstan since the beginning of this decade.

On January 11, 2022, President Tokayev appointed Askar Umarov Minister of Information and Social Development of Kazakhstan. The Tsargrad TV reacted to this with a series of materials describing the latter as an ‘open Russophobe’. This Russian media outlet also called President Tokayev’s decision to appoint him minister ‘an outrageous gesture’. Other Russian media picked up its initiative. They were joined by some Moscow’s officials and Russian politicians. There was a lot of noise. Some of Russian politicians, experts and journalists went so far as to describe Kazakhstan’s Minister of Information, Askar Umarov, as ‘a person with nazi and chauvinist views towards Russians’.

Yevgeny Primakov, who heads the Russian Foreign Ministry’s international cooperation agency Rossotrudnichestvo, reacted to the appointment of Askar Umarov as Minister in the following way: Rossotrudnichestvo ‘won’t cooperate with Russophobic trash’. He added: “Rossotrudnichestvo does not maintain contact, work or co-operate with Russophobic garbage, so that rules out any co-operation on our part with this Minister and the Ministry he leads”. Dmitry Rogozin, the then Roskosmos (space agency) director, advised Askar Umarov on Twitter not to visit the Baikonur cosmodrome. “Minister Askar Umarov is not welcome at the Baikonur Cosmodrome”, he wrote. By the way, the Baikonur Cosmodrome is located on the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan

The result of all that was not long in coming. Askar Umarov was relieved of his office on September 2, 2022. He held his position as Information Minister just for seven-plus months.

On September 2, 2022, Darkhan Kydyrali was appointed Minister of Information and Social Development of Kazakhstan. The Tsargrad TV reacted to this news very restrained: “A certain Darkhan Kydyrali has been appointed Minister [of Information] in his [Umarov’s] place”. As far as can be judged, the Russian propaganda media did not pay much attention to him until mid-August, 2023. But then the situation changed. There was information that the website of the Russian Tsargrad TV channel was blocked in Kazakhstan by the decision of the Ministry of Information and Social Development. The head of the Ministry made an explanatory statement.

Darkhan Kydyrali said that the blocking of the website of the Russian Tsargrad TV channel was due to the adoption of measures to ensure information security. The Minister of Information stressed that this topic should not be politicized.  “There is no need to look for political subtext in this. As in any State, information security is important for us. Therefore, content, a site that poses a threat to the information space, contradicts our Constitution, the legal norms of our State and the law on the media, is blocked”, the Minister said in an interview with Qazaqstan TV.

As an example, Darkhan Kydyrali pointed out that since 2016, more than 40 websites registered abroad have been blocked in Kazakhstan. “The site you mentioned is one of them. We warn publications about the need to comply with our standards, but if the media do not comply with our requirements, then they will certainly be blocked. And regardless of whether it is foreign or domestic media, we urge everyone to observe and respect our laws”, he added. What happened next?

Here is what the Novye Izvestiya newspaper had to say in this regard: “After the blocking of the Tsargrad TV channel in Kazakhstan, calls for radical action against the neighboring country began to be heard among the Russian patriotic public… There were reports that in Kazakhstan, ‘a hunt has begun for the defenders of the Russian world’. Even calls for active action began to be read in some passages by Tsargrad”. Konstantin Malofeev, who owns the Tsargrad TV Channel and had founded the Tsargrad website, came out with a very robust statement on the Kazakh Information Ministry’s decision.

After a few days, on September 1, 2022, Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev dismissed Darkhan Kydyrali from his ministerial post.

The next day, on September 2, 2023, Aida Balayeva, a specialist in Russian language and literature with a university diploma, was appointed to the post of Minister of Culture and Information of Kazakhstan by presidential decree.

The issues related to the above comments and others like them remain the actuality.

The post Kazakhstan: Mme Balayeva’s Information Ministry For Years Ignores Anti-Kazakh Hate Comments In Kazakhstani E-Media – OpEd first appeared on The South Caucasus News.


Categories
Sites

No Evidence That England’s New ‘Biodiversity Boost’ Planning Policy Will Help Birds Or Butterflies


No Evidence That England’s New ‘Biodiversity Boost’ Planning Policy Will Help Birds Or Butterflies

Researchers trialled the UK's new statutory biodiversity metric by using it to calculate the biodiversity value of 24 sites across England. These sites have all been monitored over the long-term, allowing the team to compare biodiversity species data with results from the metric. CREDIT: Jill Marshall

A new legal requirement for developers to demonstrate a biodiversity boost in planning applications could make a more meaningful impact on nature recovery if improvements are made to the way nature’s value is calculated, say researchers at the University of Cambridge.

From 2024, the UK’s Environment Act requires planning applications to demonstrate an overall biodiversity net gain of at least 10% as calculated using a new statutory biodiversity metric.

The researchers trialled the metric by using it to calculate the biodiversity value of 24 sites across England. These sites have all been monitored over the long-term, allowing the team to compare biodiversity species data with results from the metric.

Plant biodiversity at the sites matched values produced using the metric, but bird and butterfly biodiversity did not.

This means there’s no evidence that a 10% net biodiversity gain calculated using the statutory biodiversity metric will translate into real-life gains for birds and butterflies, without additional conservation management.

This is the first comprehensive study of the performance of Defra’s statutory biodiversity metric across England. The results are published in the Journal of Applied Ecology.

Plants, birds and butterflies have been comprehensively surveyed in England over many years, and are used as indicators for the national state of nature.

The researchers say the metric must be improved to better capture the intricacies of the different species within an ecosystem.

“The statutory biodiversity metric is a really important opportunity, and has potential to direct a lot of money into biodiversity conservation from developers. It’s the responsibility of conservationists and policy makers to ensure that it provides a reliable indication of nature’s diversity,” said Dr Cicely Marshall in the University of Cambridge’s Department of Plant Sciences, first author of the paper.

She added: “At the moment the metric does capture plant diversity quite well, but it doesn’t reflect the intricacies of ecosystems – species like birds and butterflies use habitats in very different ways.”

The metric, created by the UK Government’s Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), was introduced as part of the Environment Act with its legally binding agenda to deliver “the most ambitious environmental programme of any country on earth.” It scores the condition and distinctiveness of a piece of land to calculate its biodiversity value in standardised ‘biodiversity units.’

This allows developers to project biodiversity losses and gains across a site, so they can ensure the development achieves an overall minimum 10% biodiversity gain. Landowners can use the tool to calculate the biodiversity value of their land.

Marshall, who is also a Research Fellow at King’s College, Cambridge, said: “Many property developments have been very detrimental to nature in the past, and it’s exciting that England now has a requirement for developers to leave nature in a better state than they found it.

“We hope our study will contribute to improving the way nature’s value is calculated, to make the most of this valuable opportunity for nature recovery.”

The results of the study have been used to make recommendations to Defra and Natural England to help improve the metric.

The metric uses habitat as a proxy for biodiversity, scoring habitats’ intrinsic distinctiveness and current condition. Plans for biodiversity gain can involve replacing lost habitat with similar habitat – the researchers say that nature recovery could be improved if the particular species and habitats impacted by a development were also taken into account in this process.

There can be huge differences in biodiversity across habitats like croplands, for example, and these aren’t captured by the metric which assigns all cropland the same condition score. Conventional farms that regularly use artificial pesticides and herbicides have much lower biodiversity than organic farms that do not.

“There are great differences in the ecological value of cropland depending on how it’s managed, but the metric gives all cropland a low biodiversity score. It would be nice to see these differences reflected,” said Marshall.

The UK is committed to building 300,000 homes a year by mid-2020, so the net biodiversity gain requirement is expected to generate a market for biodiversity credits worth an estimated £135m-£274m annually – substantially increasing funding for nature conservation in England.

The post No Evidence That England’s New ‘Biodiversity Boost’ Planning Policy Will Help Birds Or Butterflies first appeared on The South Caucasus News.


Categories
Sites

Drowning In Waste: Pollution Hotspots In Aquatic Environments


Drowning In Waste: Pollution Hotspots In Aquatic Environments

Fig.1. Aquatic ecosystems at higher risk of receiving land-based waste. Dark blue highlights key areas (including rivers and their basins, and coastal zones) with the highest risk of receiving land-based waste. Neon represents all the other rivers and coastal areas. CREDIT: Adriana Gomez Sanabria

Waste leakage to aquatic ecosystems is a major concern threatening biodiversity as well as human health. Inadequate disposal of waste, particularly plastic waste, has been documented in all the major ocean basins, beaches, rivers, lakes, and even in remote environments such as the Arctic and Antarctic. Previous studies have focused on estimating specifically plastic emissions into the oceans. However, no study has comprehensively assessed waste leakage into aquatic environments from a waste management perspective.;

IIASA researchers adopted a waste systems perspective to identify hotspots of land-waste leakage, and determined which rivers, lakes, and coastal areas are particularly at risk. The results indicate a need for urgent action.

“Our study shows that the majority of leakage of municipal solid waste – everyday items that are discarded by people – into aquatic environments occur in Africa, China, India, and South Asia. It’s necessary to start focusing on improving waste management systems in these affected areas,” explains study lead author Adriana Gomez Sanabria, a researcher in the Pollution Management Research Group of the IIASA Energy, Climate, and Environment Program.

The study highlights that focusing on single waste streams can lead to unintended consequences. For example, as single-use plastic cups are replaced with paper cups, the amount of paper waste has increased. Therefore, it is crucial to set targets that address multiple waste streams simultaneously. Additionally, the study emphasizes the importance of universal waste collection as the primary strategy to prevent waste leakage into terrestrial and aquatic environments, even in a scenario where overall waste generation is reduced.

“Our analysis shows that there is a pressing need to establish a standardized framework to monitor waste generation, composition, and flows. This framework should help us track the effectiveness of actions, including political, economic, and technological measures aimed at reducing waste and improving waste management systems,” notes Florian Lindl, a study coauthor and researcher in the IIASA Pollution Management Research Group.;

The research team notes that their study addresses a crucial gap in our understanding of how waste management systems play an important role in addressing various environmental impacts. By examining the interaction between waste management and waste leakage, effective strategies can be identified to reduce pollution in aquatic environments and preserve ecosystems. This knowledge is vital for shaping policies and promoting sustainable development practices that minimize the environmental footprint of our consumption habits.

“We need to understand that the primary function of waste management systems is to protect human health and the environment. As creators of the waste crisis, we must take responsibility by changing our behavior to reduce consumption through refuse, rethink, and reuse practices,” concludes Gomez Sanabria.

The post Drowning In Waste: Pollution Hotspots In Aquatic Environments first appeared on The South Caucasus News.