The post Sydney Sweeney styles belted jacket sans pants in New York City first appeared on Trump News – trump-news.org.
Day: November 4, 2025
Putin and the issue of the transfer of power in Russia – Google Search google.com/search?q=Putin+an…
Vladimir Putin has effectively addressed the issue of the transfer of power by altering the political system to allow him to remain in power until at least 2036, while also delegating day-to-day management and cultivating a new generation of loyal officials. The transition is designed not for a genuine handover to a single successor, but to maintain authority firmly in Putin’s hands through a reorganized system. [1, 2, 3]
Key Aspects of the Power Structure • Constitutional Changes: A 2020 national referendum approved constitutional amendments that, among other things, effectively reset Putin’s presidential term limits, allowing him to run for two more six-year terms after his current term expired in 2024.
• Delegation, Not Relinquishment: Current personnel moves (in 2024-2025) indicate a “regime transition” where Putin delegates routine management to younger officials from his inner circle while retaining strategic and ultimate control.
• Strengthening Other Bodies: Putin has enhanced the role of the State Council and the Security Council, which some analysts believe could be potential “retirement homes” allowing him to retain significant influence even if he were to eventually leave the presidency.
• Absence of a Clear Successor: While several individuals are discussed as potential successors (such as Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin, Tula Governor Alexei Dyumin, and Defense Minister Andrei Belousov), no single person has been clearly designated. Putin has stated that the choice is ultimately for the people and that there should be several candidates.
• Cultivating Loyalty: Promotions are favoring younger officials, including former bodyguards and those from the security services, whose fortunes and loyalty are personally tied to Putin. He has also indicated that future political leaders must be veterans of the Ukraine war, further entrenching a hard-line, nationalist approach. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]In essence, the issue of the “transfer of power” in Russia under Putin has been reframed. Instead of planning to transfer power to a successor, Putin has transformed the system to ensure his continued rule and the preservation of his political model for the long term. [1, 9, 10]
AI responses may include mistakes.
[1] nestcentre.org/transition-wi…
[2] nestcentre.org/transition-wi…
[3] npr.org/2020/07/01/886440694…
[4] meduza.io/en/feature/2020/01…
[5] aljazeera.com/news/2020/3/10…
[6] newsweek.com/russia-ukraine-…
[7] reuters.com/world/europe/put…
[8] rferl.org/a/russia-putin-suc…
[9] politico.eu/article/who-will…
[10] institutmontaigne.org/en/exp…
–
lansinginstitute.org/2025/10…— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Nov 4, 2025
The post Putin and the issue of the transfer of power in Russia – Google Search https://www.google.com/search?q=Putin+and+the+issue+of+the+transfer+of+power+in+Russia&rlz=1C1ONGR_enUS1133US1133&oq=Putin+and+the+issue+of+the+transfer+of+power+in+Russia&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIHCAEQIRigATIHCAIQIRigATIHCAMQIRigATIHCAQQIRigATIHCAUQIRigATIHCAYQIRirAtIBCTM0MzQwajBqN6gCALACAA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Vladimir Putin has effectively addressed the issue of the transfer of power by altering the political system to allow him to remain in power until at least 2036, while also delegating day-to-day management and cultivating a new generation of loyal officials. The transition is designed not for a genuine h first appeared on FBI Reform – fbireform.com.
Putin and the issue of the transfer of power in Russia – Google Search google.com/search?q=Putin+an…
Vladimir Putin has effectively addressed the issue of the transfer of power by altering the political system to allow him to remain in power until at least 2036, while also delegating day-to-day management and cultivating a new generation of loyal officials. The transition is designed not for a genuine handover to a single successor, but to maintain authority firmly in Putin’s hands through a reorganized system. [1, 2, 3]
Key Aspects of the Power Structure • Constitutional Changes: A 2020 national referendum approved constitutional amendments that, among other things, effectively reset Putin’s presidential term limits, allowing him to run for two more six-year terms after his current term expired in 2024.
• Delegation, Not Relinquishment: Current personnel moves (in 2024-2025) indicate a “regime transition” where Putin delegates routine management to younger officials from his inner circle while retaining strategic and ultimate control.
• Strengthening Other Bodies: Putin has enhanced the role of the State Council and the Security Council, which some analysts believe could be potential “retirement homes” allowing him to retain significant influence even if he were to eventually leave the presidency.
• Absence of a Clear Successor: While several individuals are discussed as potential successors (such as Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin, Tula Governor Alexei Dyumin, and Defense Minister Andrei Belousov), no single person has been clearly designated. Putin has stated that the choice is ultimately for the people and that there should be several candidates.
• Cultivating Loyalty: Promotions are favoring younger officials, including former bodyguards and those from the security services, whose fortunes and loyalty are personally tied to Putin. He has also indicated that future political leaders must be veterans of the Ukraine war, further entrenching a hard-line, nationalist approach. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]In essence, the issue of the “transfer of power” in Russia under Putin has been reframed. Instead of planning to transfer power to a successor, Putin has transformed the system to ensure his continued rule and the preservation of his political model for the long term. [1, 9, 10]
AI responses may include mistakes.
[1] nestcentre.org/transition-wi…
[2] nestcentre.org/transition-wi…
[3] npr.org/2020/07/01/886440694…
[4] meduza.io/en/feature/2020/01…
[5] aljazeera.com/news/2020/3/10…
[6] newsweek.com/russia-ukraine-…
[7] reuters.com/world/europe/put…
[8] rferl.org/a/russia-putin-suc…
[9] politico.eu/article/who-will…
[10] institutmontaigne.org/en/exp…
–
lansinginstitute.org/2025/10…— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Nov 4, 2025
Allison Robbert/For The Washington Post via Getty Images
- A former Trump student-loan official is leading a lawsuit against the administration’s debt collection efforts.
- The lawsuit accused Trump and credit reporting bureaus of unfair credit reporting.
- It comes after Trump resumed collections on defaulted student loans in May after a five-year pause.
A former Trump official is taking legal action against the administration over its treatment of student-loan borrowers who miss payments.
At the end of October, A. Wayne Johnson — who oversaw the federal student-loan portfolio during President Donald Trump’s first term — launched a class action lawsuit with Georgia-based law firm Cooper, Barton, & Cooper, against the Department of Education and credit reporting firms Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion.
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of four borrowers who said they were falsely recorded as having defaulted on their loans and struggled to receive help from the department, and others similarly affected.
It accused the department and the credit reporting firms of “willful violations” of the Fair Credit Reporting Act that have “forced millions of borrowers into reported serious delinquency and even wrongful default, destroyed their financial futures, and extracted billions of dollars” from borrowers by marking them as delinquent without providing sufficient aid to enroll them in repayment plans.
Specifically, the lawsuit said that a decline in servicer capacity, mass layoffs at the department, and a lack of proper funding have contributed to a wave of improper defaults. Johnson said in a video that the relief the class action seeks includes $100,000 returned to each member and the removal of all negative credit reporting from borrowers’ credit reports.
An Education Department spokesperson said the lawsuit is “an embittered attempt by ideologues” to change the way the administration collects student loans. An Equifax spokesperson said the company does not comment on pending litigation, and Experian and TransUnion did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.
In May, the department resumed collections on defaulted student loans after a five-year pause. Linda McMahon, Trump’s education secretary, wrote in an April opinion piece that the collections restart wasn’t intended to “be unkind to student borrowers.”
“Borrowing money and failing to pay it back isn’t a victimless offense,” McMahon said. “Debt doesn’t go away; it gets transferred to others.”
About 5 million borrowers are in default, and the New York Federal Reserve’s quarterly report on household debt and credit found that 10.2% of student borrowing was in serious delinquency in the second quarter of 2025, putting borrowers a step closer toward defaulting and facing wage garnishment or other penalties. Default typically happens after 270 days of missed payments.
Borrowers who were declared as seriously delinquent or in default since January 1, 2025, and are interested in joining the class action lawsuit can submit their information here.
The post A former Trump student-loan official calls for at least $100,000 to be returned to borrowers who faced ‘unfair’ credit reporting first appeared on Trump News – trump-news.org.
The post 2 Massachusetts men have been arrested in the weekend explosion at Harvard Medical School, FBI says first appeared on Trump News – trump-news.org.
Eugene Gologursky/Getty Images for The New Yorker
- Paramount and its new owners, Larry and David Ellison, have worked to win Donald Trump’s favor.
- Donald Trump likes that, and says so out loud.
- But Paramount has also made deals to keep high-profile Trump critics on board: First “South Park,” and now Jon Stewart.
After Paramount announced it was canceling Stephen Colbert’s show last summer, his friend Jon Stewart responded with an “f-bomb-filled monologue” aimed at the company and the Trump administration. Stewart, like many others, believed Paramount pulled the plug on Colbert, a frequent Trump critic, for political reasons.
So it would be weird for Stewart, who is also a committed Trump critic, to stay on with Paramount after that. Right?
Nope: Stewart has re-signed with Paramount, and will continue hosting “The Daily Show” for the company through the end of 2026.
Which is another reminder that while the “David and Larry Ellison are tilting Paramount to the right to please Donald Trump” narrative has elements of truth to it, it’s not necessarily the entire truth.
As I’ve noted before, Paramount has made multiple moves in the last year that seem designed to please Trump — or, in some cases, were made explicitly to please Trump and his administration. Some of them were made under the Ellisons’ ownership, and some were made as previous owner Shari Redstone was finalizing a deal to sell the company to the Ellisons.
Among them: Paying Trump $16 million to settle what should have been a spurious lawsuit over a “60 Minutes” interview; agreeing to dispense with DEI initiatives; hiring an ombudsman with conservative credentials to oversee complaints about supposed bias at CBS News; and acquiring Bari Weiss’ Free Press and installing Weiss as editor in chief at CBS News.
And Donald Trump has definitely noticed those efforts. He has repeatedly praised the Ellisons and their ownership, including during a recent interview with … “60 Minutes“.
The Ellisons, meanwhile, are counting on Trump’s blessing if they move forward with plans to buy Warner Bros. Discovery. “We have a good relationship with the administration,” David Ellison noted last month.
Scott Kowalchyk/CBS via Getty Images
On the other hand! Before Ellison formally took over Paramount, he agreed to a $1.5 billion deal to lock down “South Park” — a show that has gone out of its way to mock Trump this year. Now he has re-signed another super high-profile Trump opponent.
And while many people, including Colbert himself, believe he’s a victim of political appeasement, we’ve yet to see anything beyond circumstantial evidence for that argument. Paramount itself has said it canceled the show for financial reasons, which seems at the very least plausible, given the decline of late-night TV.
There’s also the fact that Colbert is still on the air, and will remain there through next spring. So he’s not exactly being silenced.
Which brings us back to Stewart. If Paramount really were purging its Trump critics, it wouldn’t be signing him to another contract.
So yes: The Ellisons clearly want Trump’s approval. But they also want an audience. Which means they’ll pay Trump $16 million one month and Jon Stewart the next — and keep hoping they can satisfy both.
The post Jon Stewart’s new deal shows Paramount isn’t just Trump TV first appeared on Trump News – trump-news.org.
The post The Nets’ out-of-the-box solution to their playmaking inexperience first appeared on Trump News – trump-news.org.
Russia’s Managed Succession: Signs of an Approaching Power Transit – Robert Lansing Institute lansinginstitute.org/2025/10…
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Nov 4, 2025
The post Russia’s Managed Succession: Signs of an Approaching Power Transit – Robert Lansing Institute https://lansinginstitute.org/2025/10/17/russias-managed-succession-signs-of-an-approaching-power-transit/ first appeared on FBI Reform – fbireform.com.
Russia’s Managed Succession: Signs of an Approaching Power Transit – Robert Lansing Institute lansinginstitute.org/2025/10…
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Nov 4, 2025

