Day: October 9, 2025

My  #Opinion: The FBI is effectively dismantled under Kash Patel. And this is for better.
I want to clarify: the  #FBI that has been dismantled by Patel, is the end wave of the old  #Obama– #Comey FBI which was psychopathic, delusional, and grandiose; in one word, crazy, and dangerously so. The proof is in the pudding: the whole line of the current events is the demonstration of the FBI problems stemming from those times.
We are witnessing the fundamental, historical failure of the FBI (the “old one”).
AI Overview:
While it is your opinion that the  #FBI is being “dismantled” under Director  #KashPatel and that this is a  #positive development, this is a highly controversial and contested assessment. Since Patel’s confirmation in February 2025, his actions have led to claims of politicization, retaliation, and a weakening of the bureau from his critics. [1, 2, 3, 4] 
Here’s an overview of the changes implemented and the differing perspectives surrounding them:
Changes initiated by Director Patel • Personnel reshuffling: Patel quickly moved to reorganize the bureau, reassigning approximately 1,500 agents and staff from FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C., to field offices across the country. The move aligns with his previously stated aim to get more agents “out in the field” and away from what he has called the “deep state” bureaucracy of the D.C. headquarters.
• Deputy Director appointment: Patel appointed Dan Bongino, a former police officer and Secret Service agent known for embracing conspiracy theories about the FBI, as his Deputy Director.
• Political firings: Throughout 2025, Patel has fired or forced out experienced FBI agents, a move critics call a “personnel purge”.

• Many of the removed agents had previously worked on investigations related to former President Donald Trump, the January 6th insurrection, or had been involved in racial justice protests.
• Some of the fired agents are now suing Patel, claiming the dismissals were politically motivated retribution.

• Dismantling a corruption squad: In October 2025, the FBI’s public corruption unit in the Washington Field Office, known as the “CR-15 squad,” was dismantled by Patel. The squad had assisted Special Counsel Jack Smith in investigations into Trump.
• Controversial handling of investigations: The Democratic-led House Judiciary Committee has accused Patel of mishandling the release of the “Epstein Files” and diverting agents to cover up Trump’s association with Jeffrey Epstein. [2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] 

Arguments that the changes are positive • Addressing politicization: Supporters argue that the FBI had become too politicized in previous administrations and that Patel’s actions are necessary to restore integrity and focus the bureau on its core mission.
• Reorienting resources: Patel’s push to move agents from Washington D.C., to the field is framed as a way to refocus the bureau on more tangible crime-fighting rather than perceived political investigations. [2, 4, 8, 10, 11] 

Arguments that the changes are negative • Undermining credibility: Many critics, including former FBI officials, legal experts, and congressional Democrats, argue that Patel is actively undermining the FBI’s credibility and endangering national security through politically motivated actions.
• Politicizing law enforcement: Opponents contend that Patel’s actions, such as firing agents for political reasons and targeting perceived enemies in the media, are an unprecedented effort to politicize federal law enforcement and turn it into a tool of political retribution.
• Weakening institutional knowledge: The purge of experienced agents has raised concerns that the FBI is losing critical institutional knowledge and expertise, making it less effective at its job. [1, 2, 7, 8, 12, 13] 

Public perception • Since 2018, public trust in the FBI has declined, and it remains heavily divided along partisan lines.
• A 2025 Pew Research Center poll showed that Republicans’ views of the FBI had rebounded, while Democrats’ views had shifted more negatively, reflecting the politicization of the agency
.

AI responses may include mistakes.

[1]  facebook.com/replucymcbath/v…
[2]  pbs.org/newshour/politics/fi…
[3]  youtube.com/watch?v=7mk1Kq8q…
[4]  usnews.com/news/politics/art…
[5]  democrats-judiciary.house.go…
[6]  yahoo.com/news/articles/hist…
[7]  msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show…
[8]  nytimes.com/2024/12/02/us/po…
[9]  foxnews.com/politics/fbi-fir…
[10]  npr.org/2025/06/05/g-s1-7044…
[11]  seattletimes.com/nation-worl…
[12]  msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opin…
[13]  aclu.org/news/civil-libertie…
[14]  nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/m…
[15]  apmresearchlab.org/motn-fbi-…
[16]  pewresearch.org/politics/202…

My Opinion: The FBI is effectively dismantled under Kash Patel. And this is for better. – Google Search
google.com/search?num=10&new…
I want to clarify: the FBI that has been dismantled by Patel, is the end wave of the old Obama-Comey FBI which was psychopathic, delusional, and grandiose; in one word, crazy, and dangerously so. The proof is in the pudding: the whole line of the current events is the demonstration of the FBI problems.
We are witnessing the fundamental, historical failure of the FBI (the old one).

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Oct 9, 2025

My  #Opinion: The FBI is effectively dismantled under Kash Patel. And this is for better.
I want to clarify: the  #FBI that has been dismantled by Patel, is the end wave of the old  #Obama– #Comey FBI which was psychopathic, delusional, and grandiose; in one word, crazy, and dangerously so. The proof is in the pudding: the whole line of the current events is the demonstration of the FBI problems stemming from those times.
We are witnessing the fundamental, historical failure of the FBI (the “old one”).
AI Overview:
While it is your opinion that the  #FBI is being “dismantled” under Director  #KashPatel and that this is a  #positive development, this is a highly controversial and contested assessment. Since Patel’s confirmation in February 2025, his actions have led to claims of politicization, retaliation, and a weakening of the bureau from his critics. [1, 2, 3, 4] 
Here’s an overview of the changes implemented and the differing perspectives surrounding them:
Changes initiated by Director Patel • Personnel reshuffling: Patel quickly moved to reorganize the bureau, reassigning approximately 1,500 agents and staff from FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C., to field offices across the country. The move aligns with his previously stated aim to get more agents “out in the field” and away from what he has called the “deep state” bureaucracy of the D.C. headquarters.
• Deputy Director appointment: Patel appointed Dan Bongino, a former police officer and Secret Service agent known for embracing conspiracy theories about the FBI, as his Deputy Director.
• Political firings: Throughout 2025, Patel has fired or forced out experienced FBI agents, a move critics call a “personnel purge”.

• Many of the removed agents had previously worked on investigations related to former President Donald Trump, the January 6th insurrection, or had been involved in racial justice protests.
• Some of the fired agents are now suing Patel, claiming the dismissals were politically motivated retribution.

• Dismantling a corruption squad: In October 2025, the FBI’s public corruption unit in the Washington Field Office, known as the “CR-15 squad,” was dismantled by Patel. The squad had assisted Special Counsel Jack Smith in investigations into Trump.
• Controversial handling of investigations: The Democratic-led House Judiciary Committee has accused Patel of mishandling the release of the “Epstein Files” and diverting agents to cover up Trump’s association with Jeffrey Epstein. [2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] 

Arguments that the changes are positive • Addressing politicization: Supporters argue that the FBI had become too politicized in previous administrations and that Patel’s actions are necessary to restore integrity and focus the bureau on its core mission.
• Reorienting resources: Patel’s push to move agents from Washington D.C., to the field is framed as a way to refocus the bureau on more tangible crime-fighting rather than perceived political investigations. [2, 4, 8, 10, 11] 

Arguments that the changes are negative • Undermining credibility: Many critics, including former FBI officials, legal experts, and congressional Democrats, argue that Patel is actively undermining the FBI’s credibility and endangering national security through politically motivated actions.
• Politicizing law enforcement: Opponents contend that Patel’s actions, such as firing agents for political reasons and targeting perceived enemies in the media, are an unprecedented effort to politicize federal law enforcement and turn it into a tool of political retribution.
• Weakening institutional knowledge: The purge of experienced agents has raised concerns that the FBI is losing critical institutional knowledge and expertise, making it less effective at its job. [1, 2, 7, 8, 12, 13] 

Public perception • Since 2018, public trust in the FBI has declined, and it remains heavily divided along partisan lines.
• A 2025 Pew Research Center poll showed that Republicans’ views of the FBI had rebounded, while Democrats’ views had shifted more negatively, reflecting the politicization of the agency
.

AI responses may include mistakes.

[1]  facebook.com/replucymcbath/v…
[2]  pbs.org/newshour/politics/fi…
[3]  youtube.com/watch?v=7mk1Kq8q…
[4]  usnews.com/news/politics/art…
[5]  democrats-judiciary.house.go…
[6]  yahoo.com/news/articles/hist…
[7]  msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show…
[8]  nytimes.com/2024/12/02/us/po…
[9]  foxnews.com/politics/fbi-fir…
[10]  npr.org/2025/06/05/g-s1-7044…
[11]  seattletimes.com/nation-worl…
[12]  msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opin…
[13]  aclu.org/news/civil-libertie…
[14]  nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/m…
[15]  apmresearchlab.org/motn-fbi-…
[16]  pewresearch.org/politics/202…

My Opinion: The FBI is effectively dismantled under Kash Patel. And this is for better. – Google Search
google.com/search?num=10&new…
I want to clarify: the FBI that has been dismantled by Patel, is the end wave of the old Obama-Comey FBI which was psychopathic, delusional, and grandiose; in one word, crazy, and dangerously so. The proof is in the pudding: the whole line of the current events is the demonstration of the FBI problems.
We are witnessing the fundamental, historical failure of the FBI (the old one).

— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Oct 9, 2025