Categories
Sites

Low inflation targeting is such a dubious idea. Why did the Reserve Bank adopt it in the first place? | John Quiggin

As we struggle with higher interest rates and unemployment, this is the price we have to pay to restore the ‘credibility’ of the RBA

The release of recent data suggesting that inflation appears to be stuck at 4%, above the Reserve Bank of Australia’s target range of 2% to 3%, has raised plenty of concern among economic and political commentators. These commentators might be surprised to learn that many, perhaps most, macroeconomists who have looked at the question have concluded that a 4% inflation rate would be the ideal target, at least providing that wages and other incomes kept pace.

The underlying reasoning is simple. Interest rates are the main tool of monetary policy. In a deep recession such as that following the global financial crisis, or in an emergency such as that created by the Covid-19 pandemic, it is desirable that the interest rate should be well below the rate of inflation. That is, the real interest rate, adjusted for inflation, should be negative.

Sign up for Guardian Australia’s free morning and afternoon email newsletters for your daily news roundup

John Quiggin is a professor at the University of Queensland’s school of economics

Continue reading…

The post Low inflation targeting is such a dubious idea. Why did the Reserve Bank adopt it in the first place? | John Quiggin first appeared on The News And Times.